Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Scientists examine aerogel technology’s potential for oil and chemical clean-up


Aerogel technology holds great potential to clean up comprehensively oil and chemical spills. If further developed, this advanced technology may even offer a cheaper and a more environment-friendly method to absorb oil and heavy metals from water and other surfaces.

Image Source: hollandfoodpartner.com

These are the conclusions of a group of researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who recently examined alternative modifiable materials that have the ability to absorb oil and chemicals in water.

Known for their extreme low densities, aerogels are open-celled, mesoporous, solid foam composed of a network of interconnected nanostructures. They are commonly used in a variety of applications such as aerospace construction, paint thickeners, and material insulation.


Image Source: ineffableisland.com

Through their study, the researchers have created a relatively environment-friendly form of aerogel that possesses impressive properties, which include the ability to absorb oil and chemicals without absorbing water. In addition, the new aerogel can absorb up to 100 times its own weight in organic solvents and is reusable in few cycles.

In their report, the researchers stated that the new aerogel technology has one unique property that has superior absorbing ability for organic solvents and metal ions.


Image Source: sciencedaily.com

Due to its positive societal impact, the researchers—Shaoqin Sarah Gong, researcher at the Wisconsin Institute for Discovery (WID); Qifeng Zheng, associate professor of biomedical engineering; and Zhiyong Cai, a project leader at the USDA Forest Products Laboratory in Madison—revealed that they are now eager to share their findings to the scientific community and are working on its possible mass-production.

Dr. Ali Ghalambor is renowned in the energy industry for his remarkable contributions in the oil and gas sector. Learn more about his insights by visiting this blog.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

REPOST: Mexican Oil And Gas: Christmas Arrives Early

A historic legislative initiative that reforms the country's energy sector have been approved by the Mexican Senate and Chamber of Deputies. This Forbes.com article has the details. 

pemex oil refinery
Image Source: forbes.com
On the morning of December 12th, Mexico woke up to the sound of fireworks as the country celebrated the festival of the Virgin of Guadalupe. A national holiday, the 12th marks the beginning of the Christmas festivities in Mexico, which will end on the 6th of January with the Dia de los Reyes (Three kings day or Epiphany). But for many in the energy industry, the fireworks and celebrations had a double meaning. The day before, the Mexican Senate and Chamber of Deputies approved a legislative initiative that reforms the country’s energy sector. As expected, the law includes measures to open the oil and gas industry to private and foreign investment, through cash, profit-sharing and production contracts. What is new, however, and is the result of the hard political bargaining that has taken place between the governing PRI and the PAN in recent weeks, is the legal entity of the “license”. Although the legislation still explicitly prohibits the use of concessions in the hydrocarbons sector, the license will act in a very similar way, with the idea that it will be applied to unconventional projects (primarily shale). This item made its way into the legislation thanks to the PAN insisting that the government adopt a more liberal approach to oil reform to secure PAN support in the aftermath of the deeply divisive fiscal reform process.

But this raises a rather serious problem. If a license is in fact almost identical to a concession, we should expect that there will be legal challenges to the contracts, arguing that they are equivalent to concessions and therefore explicitly prohibited. This creates a certain degree of legal uncertainty, something that the private sector will worry about, and which will act as a deterrent to investment.

As expected, the left-wing PRD party, abandoned the energy reform negotiations and the Pacto por Mexico (the highly effective bargaining mechanism between the three major parties), leaving the PRI and PAN to work out their differences. Protesters have formed a barrier around the Senate to keep legislators from getting to work, in fact Senators and their staff have been camped in the Senate building for the past week, leaving only briefly to get supplies. Though the wall that they built is quite impressive, the protest itself is rather sparsely populated, reflecting the mood of acceptance or resignation that prevails in the capital with regards to the energy reform.

At the last minute on Monday, it seemed as though the PRD might manage to delay the process by taking control of the Senate and preventing voting from taking place. Though PRD Senators held the chamber for four hours, it was a symbolic measure taken to placate the protesters outside rather than a serious attempt to derail the legislation. When they retreated, the Senate commissions voted and approved the bill, allowing it to be approved by the plenary session on Wednesday despite another vociferous protest by the left.

Before this happened, however, a further twist in the tail emerged. The PAN and the PRI agreed to a clause in the reform that removes the Pemex union, the STPRM, from the board of the company, drastically reducing organized labor’s control over the company. Ironically, this idea had been part of the PRD’s reform proposal, but made its way into the final bill via the PAN. The union has traditionally been seen as a strong ally of the PRI, and it is thought that its removal from the board reduces the PRI’s long-term influence over Pemex.

The legislation then passed to the Chamber of Deputies, in which a rapid vote took place, approving the law in the general form it was sent by the Senate. Minor negotiations still need to take place to approve the details of the law, but the final version will be completed by the end of this week. The speed of the legislative process was extraordinary, once a deal had been agreed between the PAN and the PRI.

Much still needs to be decided, in the way of secondary laws, implementation and institutional strengthening (in Pemex and the regulatory organisms), and the first half of next year will be dedicated to that. Nonetheless, it seems that 2014 will begin with the three kings bringing a gift for the energy industry in the form of a radically different oil and gas sector in Mexico, one that is ripe with opportunity.

Dr. Ali Ghalambor is an associate at Innovative Petrotech Solutions, Inc. For more updates, visit this Facebook page. 

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

REPOST: Texas's Amazing Shale Oil And Gas Abundance

Texas is known for its abundance in oil and natural gas reservoirs. Read more in this Forbes.com article.

Map of USA with Texas highlighted
Image Source: forbes.com
I’m often asked my opinion on what the prices of oil or natural gas are going to do. My answer is always the same: If I had the slightest idea what the prices of oil or natural gas were going to do in the future, nobody in my family would ever have to work another day in their lives, because I would quickly become fabulously wealthy.

Seriously, nobody knows what the price of these commodities is going to do six months, a year, two years from now. Or even tomorrow, for that matter. But here’s what we do know: Texas has an amazing volume of both commodities underneath its soil in various shale formations around the state. From the Barnett

Shale in north Texas, to the Haynesville Shale in East Texas, to the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, to the Cline and Wolfcamp Shales in West Texas’s Permian Basin – Texas is swimming in recently-discovered oil and natural gas reservoirs.So abundant are the resources in the Lone Star State that, as of June 27th, there were 843 oil and natural gas drilling rigs operating in Texas, representing an amazing 48% of all the rigs operating in the United States. Even more amazing, that number represents 26% of all the drilling rigs operating anywhere on the face of the earth!Today, Texas produces more than 30% of America’s oil and natural gas. If Texas were a country, it would be the third largest natural gas producing nation on earth, and the 13th largest oil producer. Prior to the late 1960s and the growing influence of OPEC, Texas produced so much oil that it was able to heavily influence the price of the commodity on the world market. As the Eagle Ford production continues to grow and the massive potential of the Cline Shale begins to be tapped in earnest, the state could find itself once again in a position of global pricing influence.

Home to more than 260 of those active drilling rigs, the Eagle Ford continues to amaze analysts with the rapid nature of its growth. March 2013 daily oil production from the play grew to more than 529,000 barrels, a 77% increase from just one year earlier. Scott Hanold, an analyst for RBC Capital Markets, told his clients that “While the trend is correct, we believe actual production in the Eagle Ford is higher than what is being reported.” RBC’s proprietary database reportedly pegs Eagle Ford’s oil production as high as 800,000 barrels per day, in basically the same range as North Dakota’s Bakken Shale. Regardless of which number is more accurate, there is no question that Eagle Ford will overtake the Bakken in the next several months to become the largest oil producing field in the U.S.

Meanwhile, the Permian Basin, which as recently as 6 years ago was thought to be a dying province for oil and gas production, continues to rebound in dramatic fashion, and is now home to more than 500 active rigs. According to a recent report put together by the Independent Petroleum Association of America, “Production in the Permian Basin reached about two million barrels per day in the early 1970s, declined to 850,000 barrels per day in 2007, but has since rebounded to 1.3 million barrels per day.”

The report goes on: “The potential of multi-stage fracturing in both vertical and horizontal wells has recently attracted a revival of activity to the Permian. There are currently almost 500 rigs active in the region, which makes up more than a quarter of the U.S. total. Of the rigs active in the Permian, nearly 40 percent are drilling horizontal wells, particularly in the Delaware Basin, double the share of two years ago. Vertical drilling is still very strong – more than 6,000 Wolfberry wells have been drilled within the last 10 years, according to the Texas Railroad Commission.”

All of that dramatic increase in activity and production has taken place while what many believe to be potentially the biggest oil shale in the U.S. – the Cline Shale – has barely begun to be tapped. The Cline is an enormous underground structure, averaging about 70 miles wide from east to west, and about 140 miles from north to south, with a target zone for oil production that is between 200 and 500 fee thick. Because it partially underlies the Wolfcamp Shale to the West, some companies are drilling wells with dual completions in each formation.

Activity in the Barnett, Haynesville and the dry gas window of the Eagle Ford has recently been slow due to low prices for natural gas. But make no mistake about it: the gas is still there in enormous quantities, and whenever the commodity price does move back up into a more healthy zone – which it inevitably will – we will see many more natural gas rigs come on line in Texas and elsewhere to begin tapping it once again.

Because the one thing we do know for certain about oil and natural gas prices is that they are cyclical in nature. That is the way it has always been, and you can bet the family farm it will never change.

It’s just one of so many factors that have always made the oil and natural gas industry one of the most interesting to be involved in. The next 20 years or so may well become the most exciting time the industry has ever seen, and I just hope I live long enough to see it all play out. God Bless Texas.

Dr. Ali Ghalambor is a former director of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. See this Facebook page for more information.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

REPOST: US drilling rig count sinks 12 units to 1,759

US drilling rig count fell to 1,759 as of June 21 of this year according to this Oil and Gas Journal article.


The US drilling rig count fell 12 units during the week ended June 21 to reach a total of 1,759 rotary rigs working, Baker Hughes Inc. reported. All of the losses were seen on land, with land-based drilling down 12 units from a week ago to 1,682 rigs. The offshore rig count and that for inland waters remained unchanged at 54 and 23, respectively. Of the rigs drilling offshore, 52 were in the Gulf of Mexico, unchanged from a week ago. Rigs drilling for oil lost 8 units to reach 1,405, while those targeting gas lost 4 units to reach 349 rigs working. Five rigs were considered unclassified, unchanged from a week ago.

Rigs drilling horizontally were reported at 1,079, down 7 units from a week ago, and 86 fewer than the comparable week last year. Rigs drilling directionally lost 2 units this week to reach 242. This compared with 233 rigs working horizontally in the comparable week a year ago.

Of the major oil and gas producing states, Oklahoma was down 5 units to 178. Texas and Louisiana, at respective counts of 843 and 106, were each down 3 units. New Mexico, at 75, and California, at 37, were each down 1 rig. Six states were unchanged: North Dakota, 178; Colorado, 62; Pennsylvania, 54; Wyoming, 46; West Virginia, 22; and Arkansas, 14. Alaska was up 2 rigs to 8 units working.

Canada’s rig count gained 21 units this week to reach 197. This count includes 147 rigs drilling for oil (up 21 units from a week ago) and 50 units drilling for gas (unchanged from last week). Canada’s rig count total was down 41 units from the comparable week last year.\


Access Dr. Ali Ghalambor’s Facebook page to know more about oil and gas production problems and solutions.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

REPOST: For Solazyme, a Side Trip on the Way to Clean Fuel

This New York Times article reports how Solazyme, the leading renewable oil and bioproducts company, started on using algae to produce oils and biomaterials in standard fermentation.


Image Source: nytimes.com

STARTING when they became friends in freshman year at Emory University in Atlanta, Jonathan S. Wolfson and Harrison F. Dillon would take off into the mountains of Wyoming and Colorado for weeks at time. They spent their days hiking in the wilderness and their nights drinking bourbon by the campfire, talking big about how one day they would build a company that would help preserve the environment they both loved.

Image Source: nytimes.com
They graduated, and the backpacking trips grew shorter and further between. Mr. Dillon went on to earn a Ph.D. in genetics and a law degree, and ended up working as a biotech patent lawyer in Silicon Valley. Mr. Wolfson received law and business degrees from New York University and eventually started a software business. But the two still got together every year. And they kept talking about the company that, they imagined as time went on, would use biotechnology to create renewable energy.

“These were delusional rantings of kids,” said Mr. Wolfson, who, like Mr. Dillon, is now 42.

Then Mr. Dillon found microalgae, and delusional became real. Microalgae, a large and diverse group of single-celled plants, produce a variety of substances, including oils, and are thought to be responsible for most of the fossilized oil deposits in the earth. These, it seemed, were micro-organisms with potential. With prodding, they could be re-engineered to make fuel.

So in 2003, Mr. Wolfson packed up and moved from New York to Palo Alto, Calif., where Mr. Dillon lived. They started a company called Solazyme. In mythical Valley tradition, they worked in Mr. Dillon’s garage, growing algae in test tubes. And they found a small knot of investors attracted by the prospect of compressing a multimillion-year process into a matter of days.

Now, a decade later, they have released into the marketplace their very first algae-derived oil produced at a commercial scale. Yet the destination for this oil — pale, odorless and dispensed from a small matte-gold bottle with an eyedropper — is not gas tanks, but the faces of women worried about their aging skin.

Sold under the brand name Algenist, the product, costing $79 for a one-ounce bottle, would seem to have nothing in common with oil refineries and transportation fuel. But along with other niche products that the company can sell at a premium, it may be just the thing that lets Solazyme coast past the point where so many other clean-tech companies have run out of gas: the so-called Valley of Death, where young businesses stall trying to shift to commercial-scale production.

For years, policy makers, environmentalists and entrepreneurs have trumpeted the promise of harnessing the power of the sun, wind, waves, municipal solid waste or, now, algae. There has been some success. Since 2007, United States energy consumption from renewable sources has grown nearly 35 percent, and now accounts for about 9 percent of the total, according to the Energy Information Administration.

But the gains have been punctuated with prominent failures. Once-promising clean-tech ventures that attracted hundreds of millions in federal support — like the solar panel maker Solyndra, the cellulosic ethanol maker Range Fuels and the battery supplier A123 Systems — have failed. While ethanol, derived from crops like corn and sugar cane, has become a multibillion-dollar industry, it threatens to drive up the price of those plants for food and cannot yet replace conventional fuel. The next generation of biofuels, based on nonfood plants, is still struggling to take off.

Venture capital, which once gushed to renewable-energy start-ups like crude from an oil well, has slowed. In contrast to software-based companies like Instagram or Facebook, these new energy businesses burn through staggering amounts of capital over many years for research and early-stage equipment before even demonstrating their promise, much less turning a profit. Worldwide in 2012, venture capital investing in clean technologies fell by almost one-fourth, to $7.4 billion, from $9.61 billion in 2011, according to the Cleantech Group’s i3 Platform, a proprietary database.

“These are very high-innovation, capital-intensive, long-term businesses, and new-energy technology is a very new field,” said David Danielson, a former venture capitalist who is assistant secretary for energy efficiency and renewable energy at the Energy Department. “We need a new model for how these projects are going to get financed and commercialized.”

In other words, clean-energy companies can’t rely only on the classic venture-capital approach in which investors demand a fat, fast return. Mr. Danielson said that to succeed, companies need a combination of government research-and-development grants, industrial partnerships and a willingness to pursue higher-value product lines en route to entering larger, but lower-margin markets.

“The problem with a lot of clean-tech deals is that they have been about the way you make things in high volume or in production, which means you can’t prove out the ideas unless you build factories and actually make things in volume,” said Andrew S. Rappaport, a venture capitalist who is a board member of Alta Devices, a solar film start-up.

That company is one of a handful that, like Solazyme, is pursuing niche markets for its core product, in its instance developing fast-charging cases for smartphones and tablets, until it can produce low-cost, commercial quantities of solar materials for homes and businesses. A Bay Area start-up called Amyris, meanwhile, has shifted its genetically engineered yeast toward chemicals and cosmetic ingredients as it tries to build a biofuel business.

For Solazyme, the hope is that by manipulating strains of algae to make proteins, complex sugars and oils that can serve a variety of functions — like moisturizing skin or replacing eggs and butter in brioches — it will stay afloat as it struggles to reach the next stage. And that next step is making huge quantities of renewable energy products at a price that can compete with fossil fuels.

Image Source: nytimes.com
One obvious question is whether this strategy will work. Another is, will it work too well?

SOLAZYME’S story — which is far from done — shows just how circuitous the road to creating profitable energy technologies can be.

By the time Mr. Dillon and Mr. Wolfson began their company in 2003, researchers had mapped the genome of algae, a feat that started the partners on their quest to redesign the plants’ genetic codes to produce valuable commodities. In addition to oils, algae naturally produce other substances, including hydrogen and oxygen. At first, Mr. Dillon and Mr. Wolfson considered focusing on hydrogen because it seemed that carmakers would be designing hydrogen-powered vehicles. But they soon dismissed that approach because the economic and technical challenges of capturing, storing and transporting hydrogen proved insurmountable — and the vehicles never took off.


Image Source: nytimes.com
The Solazyme partners realized they needed to make a product that could use existing equipment and infrastructure — so-called drop-in fuels that wouldn’t require car or aircraft manufacturers to make new engines or fuel refiners to use new equipment. Fuel oil seemed the best bet, and they set about trying to unlock the mechanisms that the plants use to make it.

The problem with producing fuel oil is that volume is king. Oil producers generally make only a few dollars on each barrel they sell, so they make enormous profits only by selling billions of barrels. It didn’t matter if Solazyme made a terrific, carbon-neutral product — or if it made it ingeniously. If it couldn’t make enough, the business would never fly.

Nowhere in the clean-tech sector is the conundrum of scaling up more evident than in biofuel. Cellulosic fuel may finally be close to achieving real scale: the Energy Department, which has sometimes been overly optimistic in the past, predicts that there will be 80 million gallons in commercial production by 2015, and at least one company, KiOR, has begun shipping cost-competitive cellulosic biofuel to American customers, with others expected to follow soon. But the Energy Department is supporting research on using organisms like yeast and bacteria to make fuels that can directly replace conventional gasoline, and does not expect them to hit commercial scale until 2017. Those using algae will take even longer, until 2022, energy officials predict.

At Solazyme, the partners’ early realization of the challenge spurred them to step up testing. They poked and nudged the algae, trying to produce something that mimicked existing fuel oil. They also re-engineered the microorganisms to see what else could come out.

“The point was still a straight line to fuels, but it started to be clear how long this was going to take,” Mr. Wolfson said, describing the company’s rapid evolution toward developing multiple product lines. “This was going to be longer and harder than all of our discussions about starting a company.”

The big discovery was that algae, depending on the strain, could make oils that, biochemically, looked a lot like others found in nature or already in use in the marketplace. And industries like cosmetics, food and petrochemicals would pay more for each gallon, or milliliter, of output. All of the oils in question, whether destined to become gear lubricants or salad dressings, have a similar molecular backbone. But properties like melt point, saturation level or energy storage could be manipulated by adding or subtracting carbon atoms or controlling the location and connection of fatty acids and hydrogen atoms.

But there was a catch: the partners had sold investors on an energy business, not one that made cosmetics, nutritional supplements and soap. They had also told their board that they would be able to make fuel through photosynthesis, a process then considered “sexy,” Mr. Wolfson said. That’s because the sunlight that would fuel the algae’s growth was free; other methods of goosing the algae included adding food sources like sugar. But growing algae where they could get enough sunlight required huge ponds of water and the risk of plant loss.

After several late-night conversations and scrambling to come up with an alternative plan, Mr. Wolfson and Mr. Dillon met with the board in a tiny conference room near the entrance to their Menlo Park lab and offered a new plan. They would grow algae in tanks in the dark in a process called heterotrophic fermentation to make the specialty oils for ancillary markets that would pave the long road to fuel.

They were worried the board might desert them, Mr. Dillon said, but their main backers, Jerry Fiddler, an angel investor who is still the board chairman, and Dan Miller and Roger Strauch of the Roda Group, the company’s largest investor, went along. The three, who had already invested roughly a combined $1.3 million, agreed on the spot to finance further testing of the idea.

Not everyone agreed with the change. Several board members eventually left, and several established venture capitalists who had been interested in leading rounds of financing refused to do so because the founders insisted on pursuing multiple markets, Mr. Wolfson said.

“It’s very true that if you try to do too many things and you don’t focus as a company, you’ll fail — focus actually does matter,” Mr. Wolfson said. “That’s portfolio theory for them. ‘I’m making a bet on you on fuel; I want you to focus on that.’ What they didn’t really understand is our platform is a focused platform to produce oils.”

IT has taken several years of experimenting — starting in a lab with equipment bought on eBay and repaired by Mr. Fiddler — to develop that platform.

The team genetically engineers the microbes to produce oils with the different properties that a customer might want. One might be an oil that doesn’t explode in a transformer. Another might be a fat with the mouth feel of cocoa butter in chocolate, or something that mimics palm kernel oil to go into soap. Starting with a one-milliliter vial, technicians make the algae multiply by suspending them in a broth rich in sugar and other nutrients, moving them into progressively larger vats until they reach the desired volume, anywhere from five to 600,000 liters.

The scientists then deprive the algae of nitrogen, which halts their division. Under this stress, they begin to produce oil, a protective response. The oil swells their tiny cells, up to 85 percent of their mass, in a kind of microscopic version of producing foie gras.

“It’s not a very healthy cell” at the end of the process, said Peter J. Licari, Solazyme’s chief technology officer. But the process could be one of the company’s competitive advantages over other approaches. In open-pond growth, for instance, the cells often yield no more than 15 percent oil, Mr. Licari said.

The resulting liquid is then fed through a series of tanks, rollers and other equipment that squeeze out the oil, leaving behind a mass that is mostly cell walls. No matter the oil, the process varies little, Mr. Licari said, and is easily adapted to make the complex sugars — polysaccharides — that went into the original Algenist skin care line.

The company has a multiyear agreement with Mitsui, the Japanese conglomerate, to tailor oils for chemical and industrial markets. In a joint venture with Solazyme, the Brazilian agricultural and food giant Bunge is building a plant next to its sugar cane refinery in south central Brazil; it will use the sugar to feed the algae, which it expects to make up to 30 million gallons a year of oil for soaps and other products. Solazyme also has an agreement to develop oils for Unilever to be used in soap, personal care and nutritional products.

On the cosmetics side, the Algenist line has been a hit at Sephora and QVC, where executives say customers are particularly attracted to the story of an accidental discovery by lab scientists working on green energy.

“We continue to tell this alternative story about this very interesting ingredient that’s come from a very unlikely source in the world of skin care,” said Claudia Lucas, director of beauty merchandising at QVC.

Solazyme executives say they will get to the fuel business eventually. By producing algae-derived oils at a commercial scale at a reasonable price, they hope to entice established companies to invest in plants and equipment so that the fuel can work as a volume business. But for now the focus is on the higher-value markets.

“The higher returns we can show out of each plant to start out with, the faster we can get plants financed and built,” Mr. Wolfson said. The company expects to charge roughly 30 percent more for its fuels and chemicals than they cost to make, and 40 percent more for its nutritional products. But it can get 60 percent more for the cosmetic oils.

Whether the company can build a profitable business is an open question. Analysts say it has amassed an impressive list of industrial partners and investors — including Chevron — but its operating figures suggest there is still more promise than delivery.

Last year, the company had a net loss of $83 million on $44 million in sales. Its stock price is $12.62, well below its initial public offering price of $18 a share in 2011 and its high of about $26. Like many renewable-energy ventures, Solazyme has relied on government income — it used to supply the military with small amounts of expensive diesel — but in the first quarter this year, revenue for research programs dropped, driven by a decline in government grants. It is also taking on debt, adding roughly $185 million earlier this year.

EVEN so, analysts are generally bullish about the company’s prospects, despite some who express skepticism that Solazyme will ever develop the fuels.

“Fuels is still an opportunity for them,” said Rob Stone, a research analyst who tracks clean tech at Cowen & Company. He added that because the new, commercial-scale manufacturing capacity could be used entirely to satisfy demand in the higher-value markets, it might not make sense for Solazyme to use up its production space to make lower-margin fuels. “I think they could make a very large company without ever doing much at all in the fuel business,” he said.

It is a point that Mr. Wolfson comes close to conceding, saying that the entry to commercial fuel production is years away, and even then might be in making fuel additives rather than the drop-ins they have been pursuing. That possibility doesn’t seem to bother anyone around the office.

Executives seem almost more excited about their ventures into nutrition, making low-saturated fats and oils without transfats. A visit to the company’s headquarters in South San Francisco included a multicourse lunch highlighting Almagine, a powdered fat and protein supplement meant to replace eggs and saturated fats. Solazyme is developing it through a partnership with Roquette, a starch processor. Included in the tasting were salad dressings, Alfredo sauce for pasta, brioches, shortbread cookies and ice cream, all with lower saturated fat and calories and higher protein contents than standard versions.

It’s a far cry from the campfire rantings of two college friends out to save the environment. But now they have a new crusade. "I think the difference that this company will make in food alone will be enormous," Mr. Dillon said. Or, as Mr. Fiddler put it: “Even if we never succeed in energy, food is hugely valuable and hugely beneficial to the world.”

Dr. Ali Ghalambor is the former Director of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Visit this blog site to find out more.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

REPOST: Natural Gas To Play A Bigger Role in Transportation, IEA Predicts



The demand for natural gas in transportation arises, according to the International Energy Agency. Read this Forbes.com article.


Image Source: forbes.com
The International Energy Agency predicts in a new report that natural gas will emerge as a “significant” transportation fuel, if and when infrastructure issues can be ironed out.

The agency’s enthusiasm for natural gas in transportation arises from the usual factors. Gas is cheap compared to oil, it can reduce dependence on imports in a large number of countries, and it emits fewer greenhouse gases than petroleum. China will account for 30 percent of the increase in global gas demand between now and 2018, according to the report.

But the possible shift toward gas will be driven by another factor: softness in demand in electricity markets. With more gas coming out of the ground all of the time, gas suppliers need additional markets. The U.S. has yet to enact significant carbon regulations. With gas prices inching up, many power plants may shift to cheaper coal. (These factors, of course, could easily reverse themselves too: the White House is said to be on the verge of proposing a new emissions strategy and there is growing pressure to revise the royalties for coal mining.)

In Europe, meanwhile, there is “persistent demand weakness.” The IEA, in fact, lowered its projections for the growth of gas in the global energy mix : the agency now expects gas’s market share to grow by 2.4% a year through 2018, lower than the 2.7% annual growth rate in an earlier projection.

Overall, demand for gas will grow from 3,427 billion cubic meters in 2012 per year to 4,000 billion cubic meters meters.

IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven also noted that the demand for gas in transportation will occur “once the infrastructure barriers are tackled.”

That won’t be easy. As we’ve chronicled here, natural gas cars tend to be expensive and so do natural gas filling stations. You get some of the disadvantages of electric cars-range anxiety–without the benefit of a fun, zippy driving experience. Honda’s natural gas Civic for consumers (pictured) has undersold projections.

On the other hand, fleet owners can amortize the cost of filling stations and they typically don’t buy cars for a fun driving experience. EV sales have been climbing, but EVs clearly haven’t colonized the world’s freeways either.


Dr. Ali Ghalambor is considered as one of the most reputable names in the oil and gas industry. This Facebook page contains more information about Dr. Ghalambor, as well as updates about the oil and gas industry.

Sunday, May 26, 2013

REPOST: Oil falls below $94 a barrel

Crude oil price was knocked below $94 per barrel. This Yahoo News article has the details. 

BANGKOK (AP) -- The price of oil fell Monday as traders concerned about global energy demand took profits ahead of economic data from China and the United States. Benchmark oil for July delivery was down 58 cents to $93.67 per barrel at midday Bangkok time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell 10 cents to $94.15 a barrel on Friday.

Analysts said traders took profits before May unemployment data is released Tuesday in Washington, which should help clarify the state of the recovery in the world's biggest economy.

"We're starting to build confidence in the economic data, but that's not going to stop anyone from taking money off the table ahead of a long weekend," Carl Larry of Oil Outlooks and Opinions said in a market commentary, referring to the Memorial Day holiday in the U.S. on Monday.

The global economic picture was clouded last week by a private survey showing weak Chinese manufacturing. That raised questions about the strength of oil demand in the world's No. 2 economy. Qinwei Wang, an economist with Capital Economics, said in a market commentary that recent Chinese indicators suggest that "general economic conditions remain downbeat." The more closely watched official manufacturing survey is due Saturday, Wang said.

Brent crude, a benchmark for many international oil varieties, fell 12 cents to $102.46 a barrel on the ICE Futures exchange in London.

In other energy futures trading on Nymex:

— Wholesale gasoline fell 0.1 cent to $2.817 a gallon.

— Heating oil fell 0.6 cent to $2.851 a gallon.

— Natural gas fell 4.6 cents to $4.215 per 1,000 cubic feet.


This Facebook page for Dr. Ali Ghalambor shares updates on the global energy industry. 

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

REPOST: U.S. transportation remains almost entirely reliant on oil (VIDEO)

This Huffington Post article reports the dependence of U.S. transportation system on petroleum. 



 
Video Source: huffingtonpost.com


From Face the Facts USA:

93 percent of U.S. transport remains reliant on oil.

As Earth Week 2013 continues we turn to one of the root causes of a central environmental issue, carbon dioxide emissions, and the biggest factor in boosting them -- transportation.

America’s planes, trains and motor vehicles consume 13.6 million barrels of oil each day. Despite rising interest in alternative fuels, 93 percent of American transport still depends on petroleum. In fact, transportation is more oil-reliant than any other U.S. economic sector; 71 percent of our oil supply powers various types of transport.

What does this mean for our C02 emission levels?

Follow this  Twitter page and Facebook page for Dr. Ali Ghalambor for more on the latest developments on the shale gas industry.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Questioning the logic of US natural gas exports



Natural gas production in the US has been promising, and many people are now convinced that the nation is entering a new era of natural gas abundance. Because of the discovery of previously inaccessible shale deposits in the Earth, natural gas producers are now pushing for an end to the current limits on US natural gas exports.


Image Source: futurity.org


To this day, however, the country’s natural gas imports continue to maintain a rather large margin against exports. While imports have gone down from an average of 15.7 percent in the last 20 years to 12.7 percent in November of last year, the energy independence pipedream remain what it always has been—a pipedream.


Image Source: csmonitor.com


Despite opposition from alliances such as America’s Energy Advantage which aim to fight the loosening of export restriction, natural gas producers stick to their logic: selling American produce to the highest worldwide bidder is the way to go. Regardless of the country producing enough gas for domestic consumption, this logic asserts a country’s right to market its own produce to the free market. Hopefully, by doing so, it could improve current efforts in increasing natural gas production and ultimately, lead the US to become a force to be reckoned with in the gas exports arena.


Image Source: jumpthecurve.net


For engaging discussions on the oil and gas industry, visit this Dr. Ali Ghalambor Wordpress blog.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

From Russia with love: Why Britain is turning to Russia for natural gas imports



In a move that seemingly cemented the burgeoning energy partnership among European countries, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and British Foreign Secretary William Hague finally met to discuss the possibilities of natural gas export expansion. Russia, with its Nord Stream pipeline, has been considered to be an increasingly “vital energy partner” to Europe at large.


Image Source: europe.theoildrum.com


“I am aware that Russia is interested in exporting more gas to the U.K.,” Hague said in an interview. “I hope that this is something our respective energy ministers might explore further together.”

The twin Nord Stream pipelines, which first commenced operation in 2011, was designed to carry about 1.9 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It is currently running from Russia’s eastern ports through the Baltic Sea to Germany.

Image Source: pennenergy.com


Because of its possible benefits to the natural gas sector, Britain has since been considering linking the pipelines to many British ports. However, because the move is mainly backed by British energy company BP, Hague emphasized that considerations for the pipeline were primarily business matters and should be given more attention by concerned institutions.

"Any contract for gas supply would be a commercial matter and would have to comply with relevant EU as well [as] U.K. regulatory requirements," Hague stressed.

Hague also acknowledged the growing need for Europe to develop its own gas and oil fields, and suggested that to do so, partnering with international energy companies must first be established.


Image Source: telegraph.co.uk


Be in the know of the latest in the oil and gas industry. This Ali Ghalambor Wordpress site provides relevant updates.

Monday, March 25, 2013

REPOST: A model for reducing emissions

Eduardo Porter recently shared the effective strategy to lower gas emissions on this New York Times article.

 
Image Source: nytimes.com


Who would have thought the United States would one day be a leader in cutting greenhouse gas emissions?

This is the nation, after all, where a former chairman of the Senate committee on the environment, James Inhofe, wrote a book aboutglobal warming called “The Greatest Hoax.” This is where a presidential election took place not six months ago in which climate change barely merited a mention, buried under an avalanche of promises to dig for coal and drill for oil.

Fuel economy performance for cars and trucks is still among the worst in the developed world. And only 7 percent of the nation’s energy comes from renewable sources, less than in most other advanced nations.

Yet when President Obama talked about the nation’s energy revolution during his State of the Union address last month, he could have boasted that American emissions of CO2 had fallen almost 13 percent since 2007. It was perhaps the biggest decline among industrial countries, and substantially steeper than in Europe, which has been much more committed to combating climate change.

Carbon emissions from the United States have never fallen this much, not after the first oil price shock following the Arab oil embargo of 1973, nor after the Iranian revolution of 1979, when American drivers suddenly discovered the virtues of Japanese small cars and President Jimmy Carter installed solar panels on the White House to heat the water.

What stands out most in this shift, however, is not environmental regulation or public concern about global warming but the price of energy and market-driven technological advancements. “It wasn’t so much a policy shift that brought carbon emissions down,” said James Hamilton, an energy economist at the University of California, San Diego. “It was irresistible market forces.”

The United States consumes 9 percent less energy for each $1 of G.D.P. than it did five years ago. Total energy use has fallen about 5 percent in the last five years.

To be sure, regulations have contributed to the process; tighter fuel economy standards are expected to lead automakers to double the fuel efficiency of new cars and light trucks by 2025. Tax breaks are encouraging companies to invest in renewable energy sources and retrofit buildings to increase energy efficiency.

But the main reasons are economic. The great recession and the world’s sluggish recovery have depressed energy use. As in the 1970s, high oil prices have encouraged drivers to drive less, and switch to cars and trucks with better fuel economy.

There is a new force as well: high prices underpinned the widely trumpeted investment in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, of shale rock rich in oil and natural gas, which pushed the price of gas to some $2 per thousand cubic feet last April, down from $9 four years ago. Cheap gas, in turn, has encouraged power companies to switch to the cleaner fuel, replacing the most heavily polluting source of energy that we know, coal.

Since 2007 the share of the nation’s electricity produced by gas-powered generators has jumped to 30 percent from 21 percent; CO2 emissions from electricity generation have tumbled more than 15 percent. This new fuel brings potential problems of its own. Environmental groups have sounded the alarm about chemicals and methane leaking from wells, potentially contaminating local water supplies and releasing additional carbon into the air.

But fracking also appears, against all odds, to have brought Mr. Obama’s early, hopeful promise to cut CO2 emissions by 17 percent between 2005 and 2020 within reach.

Will our carbon footprint continue to shrink? The Energy Department forecasts that CO2 emissions will tick up nearly 2 percent this year and 0.7 percent in 2014, as the economy recovers. Coal use in power plants is also expected to rebound as gas prices rise from their 2012 trough.

Historical precedent is not promising. The drive for energy efficiency that started in the 1970s did not continue once oil prices fell in the 1980s; among other things, American drivers fell in love with S.U.V.’s and trucks. In 1981, the Ford F-series pickup truck became the nation’s best-selling light vehicle. In 1986, Ronald Reagan had the White House solar panels taken down.

Nonetheless, there are some encouraging signs that this time may be different. The shift from coal to gas-fired power plants should be sped up by new rules requiring old coal generators to install expensive environmental equipment. Oil prices are supported by fast rising demand from the developing world and are unlikely to plunge despite new sources found in Canadian tar sands and American shale.

The United States’ experience with new fuels also offers some options for countries intent on pursuing economic growth while restraining carbon emissions.

China is rushing to develop its large fields of shale gas. Europe — where natural gas, most of it imported from Russia, is expensive and power plants rely heavily on coal — may follow suit. Several European governments have banned fracking or imposed sharp restrictions on it, but some — like Britain — are moving ahead.

Still, the United States’ serendipitous success in reducing greenhouse gas emissions suggests how much more needs to be done than switching from a particularly dirty source of carbon to a cleaner one.

Even if every American coal-fired power plant were to close, that would not make up for the coal-based generators being built in developing countries like India and China. “Since 2000, the growth in coal has been 10 times that of renewables,” said Daniel Yergin, chairman of IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Fatih Birol, chief economist of the International Energy Agency in Paris, points out that if civilization is to avoid catastrophic climate change, only about one third of the 3,000 gigatons of CO2 contained in the world’s known reserves of oil, gas and coal can be released into the atmosphere.

But the world economy does not work as if this were the case — not governments, nor businesses, nor consumers.

“In all my experience as an oil company manager, not a single oil company took into the picture the problem of CO2,” said Leonardo Maugeri, an energy expert at Harvard who until 2010 was head of strategy and development for Italy’s state-owned oil company, Eni. “They are all totally devoted to replacing the reserves they consume every year.”

Perhaps the most important lesson from the American natural gas boom is how prices drive both demand and supply. Putting a price on emissions of CO2 that reflects the burden they impose on the environment and the threat excessive amounts pose to future generations would almost certainly be the most effective strategy to persuade energy companies, power generators — and you and me — to spew less of it.


Read more articles about the petroleum industry by visiting this Dr. Ali Ghalambor blog site.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Computing for hydrostatic pressure

Fluid statics plays a vital role in the practice of petroleum engineering. Oil, essentially a fluid, is still governed by the laws that generally affect fluids. Thus, even at the state of rest, petroleum engineers must be able to understand the principles that underlie its movement, or lack thereof. One of the most important concepts in fluid statics that all engineers must master is “hydrostatic pressure.”

Image source: http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com


According to Gas Volume Requirements for Underbalanced Drilling: Deviated Holes by Ali Ghalambor, hydrostatic pressure is “the pressure of the weight of fluid.” In other words, it is the pressure exerted by a liquid at an equilibrium state due to gravitational force. Its value is considered to be directly proportional to the height of a liquid column of uniform density.

A liquid’s hydrostatic property remains variable because it is heavily influenced by two factors: local gravity and the liquid’s density. The interplay of these quantities results to a particular liquid’s hydrostatic pressure.

Image source: http://download.autodesk.com

In SI units, the hydrostatic pressure of a liquid column may be calculated as follows:

Height (in meters) x Density (in kg/m3) x Local Gravity (in m/s2) = Hydrostatic pressure (usually expressed in N/m2 or Pascal


Hydrostatic pressure, while hardly ever completely accurate, is a very expedient way to relate pressure to a height of liquid. Its practical uses in petroleum engineering include the “hydrostatic test,” a way to determine strengths and leaks in pressure vessels such as pipelines and fuel tanks.

Image source: http://linkline.ca


This Twitter account shares more about Ali Ghalambor and his work.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Weighty issues on well productivity



Though always overshadowed by the economic and political side of the oil industry, the technical aspects that pertain to oil-drilling operations have its share of weighty issues that need to be brought, even once in a while, into the open. It boils down to one thing—well productivity.


Image credit: en.wikipedia.org


Throughout the many decades since the oil boom started to define a new global age of progress, well productivity always has a progressive form—different ages, different methods, different approaches, and different views. Well productivity only points to a single concept—improvement; others prefer the term “efficiency.” For the current crop of seasoned petroleum engineers like Ali Ghalambor, it must be a guarded and consistent form of efficiency. Gone are the days when cost-affectivity must only be the sole aim. When the price of oil, for example, dropped many years ago, productivity damage was deliberately ignored over the need to minimize production costs. Over the years, the instability of oil production and the skyrocketing price of oil in the market fortunately made well production and damage prevention an utmost priority.


Image credit: caribbean360.com


Amidst the glaring hues of issues and conflicts typical of a dynamic oil industry in the global stage, the weighty issues on well productivity lies on one certain need: keeping the steady supply of oil and gas resources throughout the world in safe and environmentally responsible manner. Any approach that veers away from that will just make things fall short.


Image credit: rossthomson.wordpress.com


For more related content, follow this Twitter page.